sbwpix:  sbw
Just add Waters - Stephen Waters' casual blog

Home

About

Contents

Guidelines

Glossary

Contacts


Discussion

Recent Discussion

Create New Topic


Membership

Join Now

Login

Flag: Confusing symbols with substance

Let's not confuse symbols with substance. Turkeys aren't celebrated on Thanksgiving. Neither are trees on Christmas or eggs on Easter. Unfortunately, 300 members of Congress who voted for House Joint Resolution 4 (to authorize Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag) mistake what is celebrated on Flag Day. Not one of them can counter Colin Powell's logic when he wrote Senator Patrick Leahy in 1999:

"Thank you for your recent letter asking my views on the proposed flag protection amendment.

"I love our flag, our Constitution and our country with a love that has no bounds. I defended all three for 35 years as a soldier and was willing to give my life in their defense.

"Americans revere their flag as a symbol of the Nation. Indeed, it is because of that reverence that the amendment is under consideration. Few countries in the world would think of amending their Constitution for the purpose of protecting such a symbol.

"We are rightfully outraged when anyone attacks or desecrates our flag. Few Americans do such things and when they do they are subject to rightful condemnation of their fellow citizens. They may be destroying a piece of cloth, but they do no damage to our system of freedom which tolerates such desecration.

"If they are destroying a flag that belongs to someone else, that's a prosecutable crime. But if it is a flag they own, I really don't want to amend the Constitution to prosecute someone for foolishly desecrating their own property. We should condemn them and pity them instead.

"I understand how strongly so many of my fellow veterans and citizens feel about the flag and I understand the powerful sentiment in state legislatures for such an amendment. I feel the same sense of outrage. But I step back from amending the Constitution to relieve that outrage. The First Amendment exists to insure that freedom of speech and expression applies not just to that with which we agree or disagree, but also that which we find outrageous.

"I would not amend that great shield of democracy to hammer a few miscreants. The flag will still be flying proudly long after they have slunk away. "Finally, I shudder to think of the legal morass we will create trying to implement the body of law that will emerge from such an amendment.

"If I were a member of Congress, I would not vote for the proposed amendment and would fully understand and respect the views of those who would. For or against, we all love our flag with equal devotion."

Discuss

[Macro error: Can’t call the script because the name “commentIt” hasn’t been defined.] [Macro error: Can’t call the script because the name “commentIt” hasn’t been defined.]

This page was last updated: Friday, April 9, 2004 at 11:22:53 AM
Copyright 2013 Stephen B. Waters Weblog at: http://blogs.rny.com/sbw/
Create your own Manila site in minutes. Everyone's doing it!

This site is using the Default theme.